Questo è qualche test della mia alice 256 cn modem ethernet hm220dp con Rassppoe
TCP options string = 020405ac01010402
MTU = 1492
MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.
MSS = 1452
MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for maximum throughput.
Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 17424
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 17424
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
63888 (MSS x 44)
bandwidth * delay product:
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 696.96 kbps (87.12 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 278.784 kbps (34.848 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 56 hops
TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Imydal>ping www.ngi.it
Pinging www.ngi.it [194.185.88.15] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=118
Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=118
Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=118
Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=118
Ping statistics for 194.185.88.15:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 55ms, Maximum = 56ms, Average = 55ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Imydal>ping 192.168.100.1
Pinging 192.168.100.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=255
Ping statistics for 192.168.100.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 36ms, Maximum = 51ms, Average = 41ms
La linea qualche mese sembrava più veloce e poi era più stabile anke nel grafico si notano gli alti e i bassi, ma kiamando a tin.it tante volte hanno lasciato tutto invariato Voi cosa ne pensate?
Rispondi quotando
